After the discussion and analysis of the previous proposal, I finally thought that it would be unfair to treat all institutions with the same standard. After I analyzed each address, I found that not all addresses have the problem of unlocking and selling, among which there are many addresses that still hold and add more positions.
It is unfair to extend the lock-up process for all addresses just because of the disloyalty of a few addresses. At the same time, only the unlocking period is extended, and the previously unlocked Part of retroactive, so we should calculate the loyalty of each address, give different schemes according to different loyalty, and the retrospective of the previously unlocked part can be compensated by adding a period of cliff.
New proposal: BNC Loyalty and Lockup Compensation
By comparing the initial BNC balance of the address with the existing BNC balance, the loyalty score of each address is calculated. Combined with the initial liquidity distribution ratio, it is divided into two types of addresses: Seed and Private, and the corresponding addresses are given respectively. The release ratio per block and the number of compensation cliff blocks.
Parameter
Seed PRPR
Private PRPR
Seed CCB
Private CCB
Min.
0%
0%
216,000
100,800
Max.
50%
30%
648,000
648,000
PRPR: Percentage reduction per block release
CCB: Compensate cliff block
According to the specific calculation table of parameters:
Summary, the effect we can get through this proposal: the lower the loyalty of the address, the longer the extended unlocking and cliff time, the higher the loyalty of the address, the shorter the unlocking and cliff time of singing, we can discuss and determine the above parameters , to achieve the desired effect.
You have to do something Bulat.
The way things are going we are going to have a very hard time getting more liquidity into the project. I fully support the longer vesting time.
Hi guys, sorry for being too busy a while ago. Recently, I have re-organized the proposal and successfully submitted the latest proposal on the chain. Since there is currently an ongoing referendum proposal, we are currently in the proposal stage, and you need to click Second to ensure that It could appear in the next referendum proposal.
The latest change, I updated the parameters in the previous proposal, they make the influence of loyalty on Cliff and Vesting become larger, the adjustment of parameters will make the proposal more effective.
The following are the latest parameters:
Seed PRPR
Private PRPR
Seed CCB
Private CCB
Min.
0%
0%
0
0
Max.
50%
30%
864,000
648,000
PRPR: Percentage reduction per block release
CCB: Compensate cliff block
According to the specific calculation table of parameters:
If you support, please use your $BNC to cast a valuable vote, if you disagree, please also give your suggestions in the comments, thank you!